Development and Formative Evaluation of a Flipbook-Based Digital Module for Basic Guidance and Counseling

Abstract

Digital teaching materials may provide greater visual support, flexibility, and instructional guidance than conventional materials in counselor education. This study aimed to develop a flipbook-based digital teaching module for the Basic Guidance and Counseling course and obtain preliminary evidence of its content feasibility, instructional appropriateness, and lecturer-perceived usability. The study used an ADDIE-informed development research design comprising analysis, design, development, limited implementation, and formative evaluation. The module included learning outcomes, concept maps, instructional content, summaries, assignments, multimedia-supported explanations, navigation features, and references. Formative evaluation involved three guidance and counseling experts and three lecturers. Data were collected using an expert validation sheet, lecturer usability questionnaire, open-ended questionnaire, and focus group discussion guide. Quantitative ratings were analyzed descriptively using a five-point scale, while qualitative comments were categorized and used to revise the module. The mean expert rating was 3.82, indicating that the module was considered feasible according to the predetermined assessment criteria. Lecturer ratings were 3.72 during individual review and 4.14 during limited usability evaluation, while the structured rating obtained following the focus group discussion was 4.66. Feedback resulted in revisions to the module’s language, illustrations, navigation, and implementation guidance. These findings provide preliminary evidence that the module is feasible in content and instructional organization and is perceived by lecturers as usable for Basic Guidance and Counseling instruction. Further evaluation involving students and classroom implementation is required to assess student usability and learning outcomes.

Keywords
  • ADDIE
  • digital teaching module
  • flipbook
  • guidance and counseling
  • higher education
How to Cite
Hasibuan , M. F., Wastuti, S. N. Y., & Asbi, A. (2026). Development and Formative Evaluation of a Flipbook-Based Digital Module for Basic Guidance and Counseling. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 11(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.23916/00202601152210
References
  1. Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 126-150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
  2. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
  3. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
  4. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: the addie approach. Springer US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  5. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
  6. Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., Mufidah, V. N., & Achmadi. (2021). Emergency remote teaching evaluation of the higher education in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(8), e07788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07788
  7. Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors (Basel), 20(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
  8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8 ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315456539
  9. Delita, F., Berutu, N., & Nofrion, N. (2022). Online Learning: The Effects of Using E-Modules on Self-Efficacy, Motivation and Learning Outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182760
  10. Humairah, L. P., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Pengembangan E-Modul IPA Berbasis Flipbook Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 14(01), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2024.v14.i01.p26-34
  11. Johnson, S. G., Potrebny, T., Larun, L., Ciliska, D., & Olsen, N. R. (2022). Usability Methods and Attributes Reported in Usability Studies of Mobile Apps for Health Care Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Educ, 8(2), e38259. https://doi.org/10.2196/38259
  12. Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Comput Educ, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
  13. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (Eds.). (2021). The cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
  14. Nadya, A., Nadhirah, N. A., Rayaginansih, S. F., Suryahadikusumah, A. R., Supriatna, M., & Fahriza, I. (2023). Technology Framework in Guidance And Counseling Services. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 7(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.202371.247
  15. Rahmiati, R., Putri, M., Engkizar, E., & Mokhtar, M. M. (2023). The effectiveness of flipbook-based e-modules in increasing student creativity in nail art subject in higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.54330
  16. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigit Sci Educ, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  17. Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
  18. Senadheera, V. V., Ediriweera, D. S., & Rupasinghe, T. P. (2024). Instructional Design Models for Digital Learning in Higher Education — A Scoping Review. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.973
  19. Xie, J., A, G., & Rice, M. F. (2021). Instructional designers’ roles in emergency remote teaching during COVID-19. Distance Education, 42(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869526
  20. Yusmar, F., Putra, P. D. A., Ahmad, N., & Astuti, S. R. D. (2024). Development of Flipbook-Based E-Module Integrated with External Features to Facilitate Student Self-Learning. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12520
  21. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0