The relationship between organizational development and teacher performance?

  • Nellitawati Nellitawati 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study analyzes the contribution of the principal's organizational development to teacher performance. It uses a descriptive correlational method, with a total sample of 86 teachers. The study used organizational development and teacher performance questionnaires for data collection. The analysis of data were based on partial correlation and multiple linear regression techniques. According to the results, organizational development has a significant influence on teacher performance.

Keywords
  • Organizational development
  • teacher performance
  • principal
How to Cite
Nellitawati, N. (2019). The relationship between organizational development and teacher performance?. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 4(4), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.23916/0020190425240
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Ambrosetti, A. (2011). Mentoring relationships, roles and responsibilities in pre-service teacher professional placements. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Hobart.
  2. Anderson, D. L. (2019). Organization development: The process of leading organizational change: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
  3. Ball, S. J. (2012). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization: Routledge.
  4. Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Williams, T. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: Routledge.
  5. Blundell, R., & Costa Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation methods for non‐experimental data. Fiscal studies, 21(4), 427-468.
  6. Boyd, N. M. (2010). Organization development in community contexts. Journal of prevention & intervention in the community, 39(1), 1-4.
  7. Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human resource management review, 22(1), 43-56.
  8. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
  9. Cohen, P. D., Dierkes, G. A., & Bradley, A. D. (2011). Facilitating performance of submitted tasks by mobile task performers: Google Patents.
  10. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization development and change: Cengage learning.
  11. Dang, T. K. A. (2013). Identity in activity: Examining teacher professional identity formation in the paired-placement of student teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 30, 47-59.
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center for American Progress.
  13. Dee, T. S., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267-297.
  14. Dobre, O.-I. (2013). Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of applied socio-economic research, 5(1).
  15. Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or Development? Australian Journal of teacher education, 40(9), n9.
  16. Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (2012). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (Vol. 36): Springer Science & Business Media.
  17. Guarino, C. M., Reckase, M. D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 117-156.
  18. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183-204.
  19. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on exceptional children, 42(8).
  20. Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2010). Enhancing teacher performance: The role of professional autonomy. Interchange, 41(1), 1-15.
  21. Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485.
  22. Lappe, J. M. (2000). Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design. Orthopaedic Nursing, 19(2), 81.
  23. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human resource management review, 21(3), 243-255.
  24. Lewis, S., Cantore, S., & Passmore, J. (2016). Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to facilitate organizational development: Kogan Page Publishers.
  25. Reynolds, D. (2010). School effectiveness: A&C Black.
  26. Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628-3651.
  27. Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational administration quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
  28. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277.
  29. West, C. (2013). The 6 keys to teacher engagement: Unlocking the doors to top teacher performance: Routledge.
  30. Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-country evidence on teacher performance pay. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 404-418.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 592 times
PDF
: 243 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.