Impact of adversity intelligence and work commitment on cyberloafing behavior

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of intelligence adversity and work commitment to cyberloafing behavior of  lecturer at the Asean Economic Community (MEA)’s era. So, this research beneficial to the development of theoretical science of industrial and organizational psychology about work behavior, as well as suggestions to keep the factors that make lecturer can avoid unproductive work habits that was cyberloafing, given the importance of the role of the faculty. This study used a quantitative method by spreading questionnaires to lecturers consisting of adversity intelligence scale,  work commitment scale, and cyberloafing behavior scale that researchers collated by self, and analyzed statistically to discussed the cyberloafing behavior of lecturers. According to Lim (2002) cyberloafing an employee volunteer activities in the office, in using the internet access that has no correlation in the work. The result of this research showed that there is correlation between adversity intelligence and work commitment with cyberloafing behavior based on p value = 0,042 hence acceptable hypothesis, and contribution of adversity intelligence and work commitment equal to 19% to cyberloafing behavior. It is expected to be a suggestion for Higher Education to improve the quality of lecturer in facing MEA.
Keywords
  • Cyberloafing Behavior
  • Adversity Intelligence
  • Work Commitment
How to Cite
Rahayuningsih, T., & Putra, A. A. (2018). Impact of adversity intelligence and work commitment on cyberloafing behavior. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 3(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.23916/0020180311620
References
  1. Angelina, D. (2015). Dosen dituntut tingkatkan kualitas. Diakses dari http://nasional.sindonews.com/read/970738/162/dosen-dituntut-tingkatkan-kualitas-1425267604
  2. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Aghaz, A., & Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.069
  4. Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081
  5. Blanchard, A., & Henle, C. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role or norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1067-1084.
  6. Henle, C. A., Kohut, G., & Booth, R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 902–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005
  7. Liberman, B., Seidman, G., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Buffardi, L. E. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2192–2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.015
  8. Lim, V . K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing, and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 675-694.
  9. Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L & Topolnytsky, L (2002). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
  10. Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient, mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang. Penerjemah: T. Hermaya. Jakarta: Grasindo.