Mastery of primary school teacher pedagogy competency in curriculum 2013 implementation in Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine how the mastery of teacher pedagogy competence in the implementation of the curriculum 2013 in the Padang city. This research uses a quantitative approach by using purposive sampling technique. Piloting school in question is spread over a number of districts in Padang with a sample of 45 peoples. The results showed that in the mastery of pedagogy competence as 52.00% of teachers have been ready for the implementation of the curriculum 2013. Traced deeper through an interview obtained results that are a weakness of teachers less able in; (1) managing the class, (2) enabling students trough the learning process, (3) varying the learning strategy. It is recommended that the training provided to teachers more intensive and sustainable so that the mastery of pedagogical competence is more optimal.

 

Keywords
  • Mastery
  • Competence
  • Pedagogy
  • Implementation
  • Curriculum
How to Cite
Bentri, A. (2017). Mastery of primary school teacher pedagogy competency in curriculum 2013 implementation in Indonesia. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.23916/0020170210020
References
  1. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Bafadal, Ibrahim. (1992). Supervisi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Bafadal, Ibrahim. (2003). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Kerangka Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  4. Blazely, L. D. et al. (1997). Science Study. Jakarta: The Japan Grant Fondation.
  5. Gerich, Mara and Schmitz, Bernhard. (2016). Using Simulated Parent-teacher Talks to Assess and Improve Prospective Teachers’ Counseling Competence. Journal of Education Learning Vol. 5 No. 2: Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  6. Khorooshi, Pooran. Et al. (2016).Explaining Idea Teacher Competences in the Islamic Republic of Iran-Based on the Revolutionary Documentations of Its Education and Pedagogical System. International Education Studies Vol. 9 No. 12: Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  7. Mulyasa. (2002). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Nasution, Agusfidar & Zelhendri Zen. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip dan Penilaian Hasil Penelitian. Padang: Jurusan Kurikulum dan Teknologi Pendidikan.
  9. Saragih, A.H., (2008). Competencies Minimum of a Master's in Teaching. Journal TabularasaUnimed PPS. Vol. No. 5. June 1, 2008.
  10. Sudjana, Nana. (2003). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
  11. Sugyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatifdan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  12. Susilana, Rudi, Asra, Herlina. The Contribution of the Self-Efficacy of Curriculum Development Team and Curriculum Document Quality to the Implementation of Diversified Curriculum in Indonesia. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science Volume 2, Issue 3. Mojes.
  13. Tambunan, Hamonangan. (2014). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Competence in the Field of Information Technology. International Education Studies Volume 7, No 12: Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  14. Wahyuddin, Wawan. (2015). The Relationship Between of Teacher Competence, Emotional Intelligence and Teacher Performance Madrasah Tsanawiyah at District of SerangBanten. Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  15. Yardakul, Bunyamin (2005). Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers Concerning the Concept of Curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2015 February.
  16. Yurdakul, B. (2015). Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers Concerning the Concept of Curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 125-139.
  17. Yusuf, A. Muri. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian. Padang: UNP Press.